Enhancing the resilience of London's food system

-
Greater London Authority

ECI lead: Dr John Ingram (PI)

Embedding food resilience in agendas such as climate, planning and health as well as addressing the overlap between income and food access could help London's complex and fragile food system better meet the needs of its growing population.

Our work

In a new report, Enhancing the Resilience of London's Food Systems, food system researchers at the University of Oxford have brought together diverse perspectives to create a set of high-level and specific recommendations to increase the resilience of a complex, dynamic, diverse and potentially fragile food system, in which 99% of the food consumed is imported from outside the capital.

The report emphasises the need to investigate and co-create multiple pathways to resilience. These pathways should be underpinned by a whole food systems approach and harness cross-cutting opportunities to ensure food resilience is successfully embedded in other agendas.

Enhancing the resilience of London's food system

Food Systems Transformation Group

Food systems
February 2022

Discussions with Greater London Authority’s (GLA) Food Resilience Champions Group were framed around four key resilience questions: Resilience of what? Resilience from whose perspective? Resilience to what? And resilience over what time frame? These discussions led to co-creation of three resilience strategies based on robustness, recovery and re-orientation.

Figure 1: Recovery (returning to existing outcomes)

Image textUrgent: Changing purchase patterns (consumers). Urgent and important: Provide chillers in FFV shops (shopkeepers), Unlock land for peri-urban farming, Increase number of community food growing sites. Less urgent, less important: Increasing the supply of delivery trucks with chilling capabilities (distributors), Exploring alternative transit routes (distributors), Sourcing food from temperate climates (governments, retailers), Helping households obtain chilling appliances (governments, welfare organisations). Important: Find alternative FFV suppliers, Make agricultural system more robust to climate change, Support the development of nature-based solutions.